Authentic Experience and the Reluctant Agnostic

Matters of religion, faith, and spirituality seem to be things I tend to mull around in my head a lot but never actually say all that much about anymore. I suppose there are reasons for that...

One being that I've always found these matters to be terribly sensitive and personal, and since it tends to be human nature to seek out validation and acceptance, sometimes speaking transparently about the thoughts floating around in your head about how you see the world that you're living in and how you believe you ought to be living your life, and when it seems like people in your life have much stronger convictions than you do, convictions about things that you can't seem to bring yourself to agree with them on... It's frightening to make that leap. No one wants to be judged harshly.

To talk briefly about the labels I've held in my life... I spent my early teenage years identifying as atheist/agnostic, I wasn't quite sure which term fit, so I used both haphazardly. My later teen years and the first two years of my twenties, I was identifying as Christian, a path I ventured down primarily for selfish reasons, I wanted to fit in with my peers. After four years of trying, ultimately there were things about the Christian faith that I could not reconcile with how I perceived reality, and I parted ways with the church. I have a bad habit of tending to dwell on my negative feelings in regard to the church, but in reality... a great deal of what I hold dear to me now philosophically are things I learned while practicing Christianity.

These days, the label I use to identify myself when I need to is the Reluctant Agnostic.

Ultimately, agnostic was the term I most closely identified with. I feel that there's always some degree of doubt that exists in regards to whatever the force or deity or whatever you want to call it that guides the universe. Yet, I use the term reluctant because I find defining myself as agnostic to be limiting and not fully descriptive. All the term agnostic tells you is my position on a higher power, and to be quite truthful whether there is or isn't a higher power doesn't really have any bearing on how I live my life.

I think one of the biggest things I brought out of Christianity was the need for being a part of a community, a part in a larger whole. Like the Old Crow song says, "We're all in this thing together." I was disenfranchised when I left because I felt I was being given conflicting messages... On the one hand, I was getting the sense that one of the most important things that people needed to be was to be open and honest with each other in order to grow into better people over time from what I was reading in the Bible, and it was being reaffirmed at every turn in what I read online, in other books, etc. On the other, when I tried to live up to that ideal, the Christians I had surrounded myself with didn't appreciate it. They did everything to shut me up. In the end, I left because to me... being open, being transparent, and being accepted regardless of my flaws rather than being chaistised was more important.

Overall, my current personal philosophy (I guess you could call it, for a lack of a better term) is this:

  1. Sharing is sacred. The stories, experience, and knowledge that others share with us and we share with others is valuable. It's to be treasured, respected and learned from.
  2. Be honest with yourself and with others.
  3. Question everything. Realize and accept that not every question will have an awswer, and that answers to life's persisant questions may change over time.
  4. Love others the way you would like to be loved.
  5. Forgive others for the things they have done wrong.
  6. Accept and welcome the unexpected, it's probably better than what you planned anyway.

Josh often uses a tag on his posts that has seemed to resonate with me... Authentic Experience... Honesty and authenticity are something I've always put a high value on. There is nothing that can rivet my attention more than someone sharing of themselves honestly, openly with others.

A link and a couple quotes

Agnostic Vs. Atheist

"A friend, an intelligent lapsed Jew who observes the Sabbath for reasons of cultural solidarity, describes himself as a Tooth Fairy Agnostic. He will not call himself an atheist because it is in principle impossible to prove a negative. But "agnostic" on its own might suggest that he though God's existence or non-existence equally likely. In fact, though strictly agnostic about god, he considers God's existence no more probable than the Tooth Fairy's.
Bertrand Russell used a hypothetical teapot in orbit about Mars for the same didactic purpose. You have to be agnostic about the teapot, but that doesn't mean you treat the likelihood of its existence as being on all fours with its non-existence.
The list of things about which we strictly have to be agnostic doesn't stop at tooth fairies and celestial teapots. It is infinite. If you want to believe in a particular one of them -- teapots, unicorns, or tooth fairies, Thor or Yahweh -- the onus is on you to say why you believe in it. The onus is not on the rest of us to say why we do not. We who are atheists are also a-fairyists, a-teapotists, and a-unicornists, but we don't' have to bother saying so.
-- Richard Dawkins, following a list of excerpts from hate mail sent to the editor of Freethought Today, after she won a separationist court battle, in "A Challenge To Atheists: Come Out of the Closet" (Free Inquiry, Summer, 2002) paragraph division added"

"Perhaps the best of the available euphemisms for atheist is nontheist. It lacks the connotation of positive conviction that there is definitely no god, and it could therefore easily be embraced by Teapot or Tooth Fairy Agnostics. It is less familiar than atheist and lacks its phobic connotations. Yet, unlike a completely new coining, its meaning is clear. If we want a euphemism at all, nontheist is probably the best.
The alternative which I favor is to renounce all euphemisms and grasp the nettle of the word atheism itself, precisely because it is a taboo word carrying frissons of hysterical phobia. Critical mass may be harder to achieve than with some non-confrontational euphemism, but if we did achieve it with the dread word atheist, the political impact would be all the greater.
-- Richard Dawkins, following a list of excerpts from hate mail sent to the editor of Freethought Today, after she won a separationist court battle, in "A Challenge To Atheists: Come Out of the Closet" (Free Inquiry, Summer, 2002)"

Thank you for sharing this!

Thank you for sharing this!

I know exactly how you feel.

I know exactly how you feel. *hugs*

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options